Is this even a legal Bill?
Mood:  d'oh
Topic: Put Parents In Charge
South Carolina State Constitution - ARTICLE XI. - PUBLIC EDUCATION
SECTION 4. Direct aid to religious or other private educational institutions prohibited. http://www.scstatehouse.net/scconstitution/a11.htm
No money shall be paid from public funds nor shall the credit of the State or any of its political subdivisions be used for the direct benefit of any religious or other private educational institution.
A) Direct aid to religious or other private educational institutions prohibited. All voucher money will come "directly from the "Public School" allotted funds, correct?
B) No money shall be paid from public funds. All voucher money is a form of "public funds", correct?
C) nor shall the credit of the State or any of its political subdivisions be used for the direct benefit of any religious or other private educational institution. Oversight - The State Department of Revenue may issue regulations to aid in the performance of its duties under the act. This violates the second part of this as well, correct?

htSouth Carolina State Constitution - ARTICLE III. LEGISLATIVE DEPARTMENT
SECTION 17. One subject. http://www.scstatehouse.net/scconstitution/a03.htm
Every Act or resolution having the force of law shall relate to but one subject, and that shall be expressed in the title. I find more the one argument to the "one subject" in this Bill; and the "expressed in the title" of this Bill.

1) Every Act or resolution having the force of law shall relate to but one subject
Nothing in this Bill title relates to "any Parent being in Charge of Anything" Everything in this Bill puts political subdivisions and "non-Parental entities in charge"! http://www.scstatehouse.net/scconstitution/a03.htm
2) Further, every "Parent is already in Charge"! We can home school our children, free from political bureaucracy; or We can send our children to public, charter and private schools.

3) WHERE IN THIS BILL CAN ANY REAL POOR FAMILY AFFORD TO SEND THEIR CHILD TO ANY "PRIVATE SCHOOL", SINCE THEY WILL HAVE TO HAVE THE "UP-FRONT MONEY?"

4) WHERE IN THIS BILL ARE ANY SGO - HOME SCHOOL ASSOCIATION or PRIVATE SCHOOL REQUIRED TO CHANGE THEIR ADMISSION POLICIES, WHICH WOULD ALLOW ANY CHILD THAT IS POOR< TO ENROLL < or IS OF A DIFFERENT RELIGION< or THE LACK THERE OF?

5) How does putting "SGO's, Private Schools or Business" in charge, put "ANY Parent in CHARGE?" see: "and that shall be expressed in the title."